From Relevance - The Newsletter of the Great War Society
Reflections on ANZAC Day
A First Hand Account of Australia's 75th Commemoration
By Don McDonald, TGWS Member
In Australia, children learn early of a glorious national legend
born at dawn on April 25, 1915. Unlike most such legends spawned by
the Great War, this one continues to exert an enormous hold years
later. In fact, tourists like myself who were visiting during the
75th anniversary were told that in many ways the 1990 australian
commemoration of Anzac Day was the grandest and most elaborate since
the tradition began in 1916.
To a visitor, the long list of Australian 8,325 dead published by
the Melbourne Age was astonishing enough, but it
was only a small part of the huge media attention given this special
anniversary. For weeks before (and for days after) the 25th, the
nation's papers carried stories elaborating on Gallipoli. Old
pictures, diaries, maps and extended commentary on all its aspects
flourished. Special television documentaries flooded the airwaves.
Gallipoli, the Peter Weir movie, was revived. A special commemorative
stamp series was issued. And the Anzac Day parades all over
Australia, always the focal point of the holiday, were larger than
ever. Over 100,000 people were estimated to have actively
participated, while many millions watched on television.
The climatic events were special on-the-spot ceremonies at dawn
and noon on April 25th at Gallipoli itself. These involved 58 of the
surviving "Diggers" and a spate of Aussie politicians led by Prime
Minister Bob Hawke. Naturally, this was all covered live on
television. Getting the 58 old soldiers safely there and back was in
itself a complex and touchy undertaking, since the youngest was 91 and
the oldest 103. They flew in a chartered 747 with a complete team of
medical and military personnel to look after them.
Presumably, I was not the only visitor to wonder at this huge
outpouring of feeling about events that have been largely forgotten
elsewhere in the world. What is it about April 25, 1915 that still
exerts such a hold on Australia?
The basic facts are well known. That remote dawn saw the Anzacs
(The Australian and New Zealand Army Corps) land on the Gallipoli
Peninsula for what was to be their part in the Allied struggle to
capture the Dardanelles from Turkey. This strategy, forwarded by
First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill, held rich promise.
Cutting off Turkey as an effective German ally would materially assist
Russia, possibly breaking the terrible stalemate along the Western
Front, and result in a "triumphant peace". Unfortunately, many things
went wrong in the campaign's execution, and the Allied forces
eventually withdrew in December 1915 after it had become obvious that
they, too, were bogged down in a hopeless stalemate.
Although the Turks never managed to dislodge the invaders, the
Gallipoli campaign was widely viewed by the world as an Allied defeat.
As such, it seems unlikely material for an Australian legend. This
apparently perverse outcome is conventionally explained as a result of
Australia's unusual history up to 1915. With its convict heritage and
federation coming as recently as 1901, Australia entered the Great War
with the self-consciousness of a new nation facing its first test on
the world's stage. When Australian troops went off to fight honorably
for the British Empire, the patriotic pride of the young nation
marched in lock-step with them. The Melbourne Argus,
one of Australia's best-known dailies of that era captured
the prevalent spirit when it proclaimed that Australia had "in one
moment stepped into the worldwide arena it he full stature of great
When the appalling casualty lists began appearing in May 1915 in
place of the expected victory, Australia was brutally traumatized.
Perhaps some feeling for their shock can be gained by observing that
Australia's total casualties at Gallipoli, on a per capita basis,
would be equivalent to about 1,250,000 men in today's United States.
What happened to the young nations's psyche under such extreme
stress? At the time, they could at least bravely affirm that their
sacrifices were in a good cause. But they also took bitter solace
from reports that their troops had fought bravely (nine Victoria
Crosses attested to this), that their fighting took place against
tough odds, that these odds were disastrously worsened by poor
planning and staff work, plus an error that landed them on the wrong
beach, fully exposed to well-prepared, lethal Turkish defenses.
In addition to their bravery, it was widely agreed that Aussie
troops had shown remarkable initiative and an amazing spirit of
comradeship. This "mateship" was thereafter considered to be an
inseparable part of the "Spirit of Anzac" and was to become an
expected attribute of all Australian fighting men.
It does not detract from this conventional view of the Anzac
legend to recognize that other circumstances also contributed to its
- Neither Australians nor New Zealanders could be blamed for the
disastrous errors of command, since the British had been in charge.
- Anzac troops performed as a unit and thus could be identified
in press reports and their casualty statistics could be broken away
from the cumulative number including British and French troops.
- The Gallipoli campaign lasted just long enough -- a quick
defeat or victory would probably have disappeared from history; a more
prolonged campaign would have tended to make its "legends" as diffuse
as those developed on the larger fronts.
- The restricted but dramatic aspects of the Gallipoli fighting,
in contrast to the extra-human juggernaut of industialized warfare on
the other fronts, allowed colorful and coherent press reports
stressing those individual qualities of bravery from which the "Anzac
Australia being a democracy, Anzac Day has encountered some
controversy. This was particularly acute during the time of the
Vietnam War, when anything having to do with war met huge resistance.
It is interesting, though, that this year the voices raised against
Anzac Day, instead of centering on the evils militarism, tended to be
on the propriety of spending nearly $A 10,000,000 to send 58 old
Diggers to Gallipoli, considering the current state of the Australian
A question of special interest to readers of this newsletter is
in what way, if any, Australia sees the Anzac events of 1915 as still
relevant to their society in 1990. I cannot give a full, scholarly
answer to this, but I gathered the following from Melbourne's press.
All commentators recognized that the 1915 concepts of Empire and
military glory are obsolete. Most, though, echoed in some way the
conventional thinking that Australia could still find "inspiration" in
the dedication and heroism of the Anzac veterans. Journalist Bill
Gammage wrote, "1915 is not 1990. In 1915 Anzacs were thinking about
the future. We can thank them best and honor them if we think [of the
bigger problems facing] the future of Australia." A few writers were
pessimistic about any kind of inspiration; one conservative wondered
solemnly whether the Australia of today would be able to find a
similar central focus in time of equivalent strain as the country did
Whatever their views on the relevance of the "spirit of Anzac" to
today's problems, all commentators recognized that the living
Gallipoli Diggers are a rapidly disappearing national resource. L.P.
Hartley put it in these terms of gratitude: "the past is a foreign
country; they do things differently there. We're lucky to still have
some guides from 1915 to take us there."
As a member of the Great War Society, I applaud Australia and New
Zealand's Anzac Day, when, without ambiguity, the horrible sacrifices
in the Great War are still actively pondered and commemorated.