j St. Mihiel Trip-Wire: September 2019



September
2019
        

Access
Archives



The Air War


Attack on an Enemy Aerodrome (RAF Official Art)





Your Editor's Unpopular Views

Since I've been studying, publishing, and speaking on the First World War, I've learned that there are some views/interpretations I've developed that are so contrary to the received wisdom about it that audiences sometimes turn skeptical, even hostile. You're welcome to disagree, of course, but here are three of my contrarian views:

1. The Dardanelles/Gallipoli campaign was never close to succeeding, nor was it ever some magical solution to the trench warfare stalemate. It was ill considered, a waste of lives and strategic resources, and beyond the logistical and command & control capabilities of the time. Ironically, it quickly turned into a case study in 1915-style trench warfare.

2. Audiences seem to dislike hearing that gas warfare was–when used carefully and systematically–an effective weapon and how it played a major role in such battles as Caporetto and the last phase of America's Meuse-Argonne Offensive. (Indeed, I always stipulate its use was inhumane, but that doesn't seem to change attitudes about my arguments.)

3. Without the entry of the United States into the war, it's likely the Central Powers would have prevailed. By 1918, everyone was running out of men, and the British and French combined lacked the manpower for offensive operations to force Germany out of its occupied territories in the West. However, Germany and Austria-Hungary, having defeated Russia, had surplus troops available from the Eastern Front. Instead of being deployed to the Western Front for offensive operations– these could have been used to shore up weaker sectors in Italy, the Balkans, and the Middle East, and, also, helped with the agricultural crisis. With such a solutionless stalemate, a negotiated settlement would have ensued that left the Central Powers with sufficient captured territory to claim victory. Whether this would have been a good thing for mankind in the long run is a debatable matter, though. MH


Aerial Reconnaissance Over Germany: 1914
By Terrence J. Finnegan


Aviation’s permanent image from the 1914 battle ground was a dove (Taube) shaped aeroplane like the one aloft at the Deutsches Museum in Munich

Without doubt, the aeroplane–newly arrived to modern warfare–contributed significantly to how armies conducted themselves on the vast plains of Eastern Europe. As the opening campaigns unfolded in East Prussia, Russian Poland, and k.u.k. Galicia, commanders grudgingly began accepting aerial reconnaissance reporting. Other new technologies such as wireless and the ability to intercept the signal gained equal stature with them. One challenge in understanding this time is that, in the minds of many historians and researchers, the wireless intercept was the key intelligence source making the ultimate difference in battles such as Tannenberg.

Taking a more inclusive view, our new series, Shooting the Front: Eastern Operations, sets out to incorporate aviation's role for Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia over the Eastern Front from August 1914 to the Brest-Litovsk Treaty of March 1918 and subsequent occupation until the final Armistice of November 1918. Volume I describes in detail what role aviation played over the Northwest Front involving the German 8. Armee facing the invading Russian First Army and Second Army, culminating in the battles of Tannenberg and the Masurian Lakes.

Aerial reconnaissance was the central purpose of aviation when the Great War commenced. The evolving technology provided combatants with a vital capability to timely assess and evaluate the terrain that an adversary held. Such was the Eastern Front–an area so vast that it dwarfed anything that the Western Front experienced. In many ways, aviation proved the most rewarding resource in support of all combatants' maneuvers. Aviation's success in the first weeks of the war clearly substantiated its role for decision-makers on the German side. Germany's Fliegertruppe (Air Service) did a better job employing vital aviation resources in the Northwest Front opposite poor execution by the Russian adversaries.


Germany’s aviation assets in July 1914 were fully in place throughout the nation and able to respond to the campaigns that followed

Ironically, technological advances in aviation favored Russia thanks to Il'ya Muromets four-engined aeroplanes. Yet this indigenous design could not be produced in quantity to make a difference until almost a year into the war. Unfortunately for the Russians, the Northwest Front did not see the aeroplane's potential in 1914. The future Il'ya Muromets legacy established in 1915 made strategic aerial reconnaissance and complementary aerial bombardment a nascent fixture for the entire Eastern Front. With the commencement of hostilities, the Imperial Russian Air Fleet (IRAF) faced modern-day challenges deploying forces and establishing the proper logistic tail to support them. Russian army commanders were responsible for aviation assets and it quickly became apparent that sustaining the aerial reconnaissance force required as much if not more attention than traditional cavalry did. The home-field advantage played an important role at Tannenberg. Russian KAOs [small squadron equivalents] supporting Russian First Army and Russian Second Army suffered extensive attrition as they were cut off from a vital logistic tail. Attrition meant the loss of vital information to Russian commanders–a loss that resulted in catastrophe. Attempts to improvise met with challenges of priorities as needs for maintenance and parts for the Russian inventory of French-designed aeroplanes overwhelmed available transport–particularly as the Russian First Army and Russian Second Army entered East Prussia. Had General ot kavalerii Rennenkampf and General ot kavalerii Samsonov employed aviation effectively, they could have exploited the dangerous gaps created by General der Infanterie von François and maneuvered forces with satisfactory results.

The battle of Tannenberg clearly demonstrated to the German command that Fliegertruppe aviation played an enormous role in the victory. Research confirms that those commanders who trusted aviation, for the most part, were rewarded with decisive movements such as General der Infanterie von François's picket line to the south cutting off the Russian retreat. The Germans did possess the advantage from the start, since aerial operations were almost exclusively flown over the East Prussian homeland– an area known to most of the German pilots. Germany's Fliegertruppe aerial reconnaissance gave 8. Armee commanders throughout the campaign the most comprehensive and accurate picture of the battle in progress. When battle came, aerial observers became critical for applying visual confirmation and reporting in a timely manner. German attention to detail made daily operations function to the advantage of a rapidly evolving battleground. German commanders became dependent on what aviators provided. Time-sensitive reporting became standardized, carried out with appropriate urgency to affect German divisions in motion. The envelopment of the Russian 2nd Army succeeded thanks to the eyes of the aviators.


A testament to the technological leap of the Il’ya Muromets in 1914 – the aircrew could walk around on top of the cabin while the aeroplane flew.

German commanders also took advantage of wireless intercepts of Russian transmissions. Wireless intercepts gave the first indications, with aerial observation confirming or discarding the intelligence lead. Winston Churchill contributed greatly to the prevailing 20th-century view that intercepts of wireless transmissions were the decisive measure that decided the fate of the General ot kavalerii Samsonov's Russian Second Army. Most notably as Churchill summed up with his customary eloquence in seven words, "This is the way to make war." Wireless intercepts rightly received accolades, but at Tannenberg aerial reconnaissance confirmed the intelligence and ensured 8. Armee's annihilation of Samsonov's army.

It is appropriate that Generaloberst von Hindenburg gave credence with his definitive utterance of crediting aviation's accomplishments, "Ohne Flieger kein Tannenberg!" ["Without flyers, no Tannenberg!"]. That sums up one of the most important battles of the 20th century and the subsequent campaigns on the Eastern Front.

Shooting the Front: Eastern Operations, Volume I, is now with the publisher and should be finished in early 2020. Terry Finnegan’s website, shootingthefront.com, is the URL for updates on publishing as well as a major source for many photos, maps, and other data supporting the work. Please note that the two fellow authors, Helmut Jäger [the world’s authority on German aerial cameras of World War I, whose access to a wealth of Reichsarchiv sources is beyond anything imaginable] and Carl J. Bobrow [a leading authority on Russian aviation in World War I, possessing the best network of contacts in Russia, particularly with the “Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy voyenno-istoricheskiy arkhiv” (RGVIA Russian State Military Archive)], have uncovered research that will treat historians and enthusiasts to the most definitive discussion of aviation over the Eastern Front to date. Feel free to contact Terry at seicheprey@gmail.com for additional information on the four-volume series.


Visit Our Daily Blog


Click on Image to Visit
  

Looking Back at WWI Aviation

The First World War was the first conflict characterized by three-dimensional war: on land and sea, in the air, and under the surface of the sea. . . The First World War defined the roles and missions of land-based and maritime air power that are still fulfilled and prosecuted over a century later. It stimulated rapid technological development, technical emulation, and technical exploitation, as well as stimulating investment in scientific and engineering facilities, laboratories, research centers, and methodologies. . .
Dr. Richard Hallion, Florida Polytechnic University



WWI Aviation History Timeline

Air Warfare from 1914-1918 Online

12 Important Aircraft from WWI

Introductory Chapter of Shooting the Front: Allied Aerial Reconnaissance. . . (PDF)

Bombing During World War I

The Technology of Air Power During the Great War (PDF)

From NASA: Design Explorations, 1914-1918

The Birth of American Airpower in World War I (PDF)

Inter-war Airpower Theory and World War II

The Aces Speak

I put my bullets into the target as if I placed them there by hand.
René Fonck (France)

If one has not given everything, one has given nothing.
Georges Guynemer (France)

The most important thing in fighting was shooting, next the various tactics in coming into a fight and last of all flying ability itself.
Billy Bishop (Canada)

To be a great pilot you have to make a pact with the devil, but don't let him swallow you up.
Ernst Udet (Germany)

Courage is doing what you are afraid to do. There can be no courage unless you are scared.
Eddie Rickenbacker (USA)


Richthofen's Triplane

The most recognizable single airplane from the Great War is Manfred von Richthofen's Fokker Dr.I triplane. With it, the Red Baron won the last 21 of his 80 victories; in it, he died on 21 April 1918. The Dr.I had not only three wings but a supplementary airfoil on the undercarriage. This allowed the fighter to outclimb and outturn almost any contemporary Allied aircraft. What it lacked was flat out speed. Its small engine, with only 110 horsepower, had the low (for 1918) maximum speed of 103 mph. This deficiency may have played a role in his final and fatal mission.

Sources: Knights of the Air, Fantasy of Flight Website


Captain D'Urban Victor Armstrong, DFC, RAF

I suppose everyone who saw him would agree that Armstrong was the finest pilot in the Force. He was a past master at that most dangerous and spectacular business of stunting near the ground. He would take his Camel off and go straight into a loop. The Camel, if the engine held, gained about ten feet on it. If the engine spluttered or missed, he was for it. His luck held until now, only a fortnight, had we known it, before the end of the war. Then, one day, he was spinning down to the ground, with him a favorite method of descent; but he left it too late, pulled out, thought he had not enough room, jerked back the stick before the machined had flying speed, went into another spin, and struck the ground. He was killed outright. They found his tongue on the engine.

From: Sagittarius Rising, Cecil Lewis




AEF Battlefields
From: Valor Tours, Ltd. / Mike Grams, Tour Leader
When: September 2019
Details: Request brochure via Email HERE.


Gallipoli
From: National World War I Museum / Clive Harris & Mike Sheil, Tour Leaders
When: October 2019
Details: Itinerary and Tour FAQ HERE.


National WWI Museum 2019 Symposium
1919: Peace?

When: 1-2 November 2019
Where: Kansas City, MO
Details: HERE.


Mid Atlantic, League of WWI Aviation Historians
Chapter Meeting

When: 23 November 2019
Where: Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center, near Dulles International Airport
Details: HERE.



Then and Now: Madeleine Farm

Over the next few months, we will be featuring "Then and Now" photos from dedicated Western Front traveler Andy Pouncey. His full website War Untold can be visited HERE.




Creating an American Air Force
Raynal Bolling (1877-1918)

Raynal Bolling, Corporate Lawyer

How did the United States create airpower upon joining the Great War? The complete story is beyond the scope of this article, but an important part can be told through the contributions of three key architects of American airpower: Colonel Raynal Bolling, Major Foulois, and Gen William “Billy” Mitchell. Bolling is the least well known of the trio and will be the focus of this article.

Air-mindedness [in the United States after the Wright Brothers' fiRst flight] owed much to civic organizations, especially the Aero Club of America, founded in 1905, which drew its leadership from the captains of industry. The Aero Club was actually a federation of aviation clubs from across America that sponsored flying exhibitions, issued pilot’s licenses, and promoted a nascent aviation industry. Promoters of aviation envisioned growth of an aircraft industry as revolutionary as the automobile industry, which was then transforming American society. The Aero Club was a powerful lobby and had been largely responsible for legislation establishing the Aviation Section of the Signal Corps in 1914. The Club also lobbied for the establishment of aviation units in the National Guard. Bolling organized one of these units in New York.

A Harvard-educated lawyer and an aviation enthusiast, Arkansas-born Raynal Bolling served on several of the Aero Club’s executive committees, including those dealing with law, government affairs, and military aviation. He would become one of the key architects of American airpower. Many readers will recognize Bolling as the name of the USAF base near the Pentagon in Washington, DC. Bolling merited this honor for his role in creating American airpower during the Great War. He was also the senior U.S. Airman killed in action during the war. His part in the birth of American airpower exemplifies how the National Guard and reserves played an important role in the formation of an American air force—the prologue to today’s total force.

Bolling initially rose to fame as the chief lawyer for US Steel. At that time, it was the largest corporation in America and vitally important to any war effort. He helped defend US Steel from being broken up by President Theodore Roosevelt, “Teddy the Trust Buster.” He was also a member of the New York National Guard. “The Guard was a hotbed of early interest in aviation, and there were many efforts to form Guard aero units in various states, the most prominent being the New York.” Bolling’s interest in aviation, combined with financial support from the Aero Club of America, led to his founding of the 1st Aero Company of the New York National Guard in 1915.

Raynal Bolling, Aviator

Bolling’s command expanded to become the 1st Reserve Aero Squadron (1st RAS) after the passage of the National Defense Act of 1916, which originated the nation’s air reserve. His squadron was among the first aviation units sent to France in the summer of 1917. It was the core organization that built and expanded into a huge American aviation training center at Issoudun, France. Bolling’s second-in-command, Capt James Miller, took charge of the squadron after Bolling left and became the first commander at Issoudun. Another member of this squadron was 1st Lt Quentin Roosevelt, the youngest son of President Roosevelt. Captain Miller and Lieutenant Roosevelt later became pilots in the 1st Pursuit Group (1st PG), the ancestor of today’s 1st Fighter Wing. Both men were killed in air-to-air combat with the Germans.

Bolling did not accompany his squadron to France because he was called to Washington to help plan the creation of a wartime air force. His aviation expertise, contacts with industry, and knowledge of the law made him an especially valuable asset in crafting legislation to create American airpower. He and Foulois drafted the bill that became the $640 million appropriation. Foulois had also only recently come to Washington. He was one of the most experienced aviators in the regular Army.

After the passage of the historic aviation bill, Foulois and Bolling focused on the next major problem –how to translate the huge appropriation into a practical plan to man, train, organize, and equip an American air force. The United States was unprepared for war, and a strict policy of neutrality had minimized contact with the European allies. An air force needed modern combat aircraft, well-trained pilots, mechanics and support personnel, and a host of other items to create combat-ready squadrons. Bolling was sent to Europe to figure out what types of airplanes America should build.

The “Bolling Mission”
Bolling led a group of officers, technicians, and other experts (more than 100 personnel) on what became known as the “Bolling Mission” to Europe to determine what types of airplanes the United States should manufacture. They met with aviation officials in Britain, France, and Italy. As a result of these meetings, Bolling realized that American aviation technology was so far behind that it would be necessary, at least initially, to rely upon the European Allies for airplanes. At this point in aviation history, the airplane reflected an immature technology, and unlike today, improvements were inexpensive and rapid. Also, the proximity of European aircraft designers and their factories to the battle area gave them a distinct advantage in turning out improved models based on combat experience.

As it turned out, American industry had so much difficulty producing acceptable warplanes that most of the AEF’s airplanes came from foreign sources. It was a scandalous failure for the nascent American aircraft industry, especially given the huge aviation bill passed by Congress. This disgrace resulted in a series of congressional investigations after the war. Accordingly, it is no surprise that France, which had the largest aviation industry IN the world, supplied 80 percent of the AEF’s airplanes.

Bolling’s aircraft purchases were of great consequence. As one historian noted, “The Bolling Commission actually played one of the most important roles in the war.” This is because the numbers and types of aircraft that he recommended for production in the United States, as well as those purchased from the Allies, would shape the air strategy in terms of the weight of effort for air superiority, observation, and bombardment. The contract he negotiated with the French, known as the 30 August Agreement, in 1917, called for 875 training planes and 5,000 service-type aircraft. Since the war would be over in a little more than 14 months, these early decisions had significant impact. In the event, however, French manufacturers were unable to deliver on time, resulting in aircraft purchases from Britain and Italy.

General Pershing was so impressed with Bolling that he retained him in France, promoted him to colonel, and appointed him as chief of the Air Service’s line of communications. In addition to aircraft procurement, Bolling was responsible for logistics, reception of aviation units, and pilot training. The other main part of the Air Service was called the Zone Advance, where the training and organization centers were located. Col William “Billy” Mitchell was in charge of it.


USAF Headquarters Bears Raynal Bolling's Name

Benjamin Foulois, who had been organizing the Air Service and its facilities back in the States, arrived in France in November 1917 and reassigned both Bolling and Mitchell, effectively demoting them and replacing them with his own handpicked officers. The move would prove a major setback for the U.S. Air Service.

Foulois appointed Bolling as a liaison officer to the Royal Air Force. Bolling became the senior airman killed in the war when his car was ambushed by a German patrol while he was attempting to visit elements of two American aero squadrons that were attached to the British. The Germans had just launched their long-anticipated spring offensive, and the front line had dissolved in that sector. Bolling was the most knowledgeable officer on aircraft procurement. His loss contributed to the unhinging of the Foulois regime, but that's another story to be told elsewhere. Colonel Raynal Bolling was posthumously awarded the Distinguished Service Medal. His citation reads (in part): Colonel Bolling's service to the United States Aviation was distinguished for an accurate and comprehensive grasp of aviation matters; for a sound and far-sighted conception of the measures needed to establish an efficient American Air Service in Europe; for initiative and resourcefulness in attacking the problems of a young Air Service; for brilliant capacity in arranging affairs with foreign governments, for boldness and vigor in executing determined policies.

Bolling Field, District of Columbia, now a part of Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, was opened on 1 July 1918, and named to commemorate Bolling. Bolling Air Force Base has served as USAF Headquarters since 1947.


From Battlecruiser to Aircraft Carrier

HMS Furious (1917-1948) Started as a Battlecruiser, Became a Hybrid Ship with the Capacity for Launching Aircraft (Shown Here in 1918), and Was Converted to Full Carrier Configuration in 1925. On 19 July 1918 Furious Launched the First Carrier-Based Raid in History Against the German Airship Base at Tønder, Denmark. During the Second World War She Served in the Mediterranean, Supporting Operation "Torch" and the Defense of Malta.



100 Years Ago:
Airpower and the Third Afghan War

British Aircraft on Patrol During Afghan War

The Third Anglo-Afghan War also known as the Third Afghan War, the British-Afghan war of 1919, and in Afghanistan as the War of Independence, began on 6 May 1919 when the Emirate of Afghanistan invaded British India and ended with an armistice on 8 August 1919. Airpower played a key role during the 3rd Afghan War (1919) and the revolt in Waziristan (1919-1920). Five Royal Air Force (RAF) squadrons of BE2Cs, Bristol F2Bs, De Haviland DH9As, and De Haviland DH-bombers were used in strafing and bombing attacks on the rebellious frontier tribes and on targets in Afghanistan itself, including Kabul and Jalalabad. The attacks on Afghan towns, although small-scale, helped bring King Amanullah to the negotiating table.

Handley Page V/1500 Bomber, "Old Carthusian," That Bombed Kabul

In May 1919, during the brief Third Anglo-Afghan War, the Royal Air Force (RAF) employed a lone Handley Page V/1500 to bomb the palace in Kabul. Although little physical damage resulted, the bombing caused great distress among the city’s residents. One author noted that “the women of the royal harem rushed on to the streets in terror.”

Aerial View of Kabul During Attack of 24 May 1919

The attacks on Kabul and other Afghan towns, although small scale, helped bring King Amanullah to the negotiating table. Within days, Afghanistan’s King Amanullah Khan had called for a truce. Nevertheless, the month-long war gained the Afghans the conduct of their own foreign affairs. A peace treaty recognizing the independence of Afghanistan was signed at Rawalpindi (now in Pakistan) on 8 August 1919.

Sources: Wikipedia, British Army Museum, RAF Archives, Encyclopedia Britannica, Imperial War Museum






The skies of New York were painted in red, white and blue–the colors of both the French and the American flags–in the spring of 2018. The visit by France’s Air Force jets marked the 100th anniversary of the U.S. joining World War One. With Stars and Stripes emblazoned on their tail fins, eight Alpha Jets from the Patrouille de France (PAF) demonstration team flew over the Statue of Liberty and Manhattan's Freedom Tower.





Support Worldwar1.com's Free Publications

Order Our
WWI Musical CD

Click on Image for Information

Shop at
Amazon.com

Order the Complete Collection
Over the Top Magazine

Click on Image for Information



A World War One Film Classic


When I was the membership chairman of the old Great War Society, we asked our new enlistees what got them interested in the First World War. I was surprised at how many mentioned the 1938 film The Dawn Patrol with Errol Flynn, Basil Rathbone, and David Niven. Only the novel All Quiet on the Western Front rivaled this film as a stimulator of interest in the war.

The "showstopper" scene in the movie, however, is not any of the combat sequences but in the mess when the pilots drink a musical toast "To the next man who dies." The lyrics used in the movie are an adaptation of a 19th-century poem out of India titled "The Revel" by Bartholomew Dowling. The film is available on for purchase or renting on Amazon and shows up fairly frequently on the cable movie channels.




Click on Title to Access Story
When the British Spied on the Australian Prime Minister at Versailles

Seaham England's 'Eleven 'O' One' Tommy

The Motor Scooter's WWI Roots

Remembering the Polar Bears

When Hitler, Trotsky, Tito, Freud, and Stalin All Lived in Vienna

Movie Trailer for 1917 (Video)

Opinion Piece: Why teaching World War I Is Crucial

WW1 Soldier's Prayer Book Returned to Family

100 Years Ago: The 37th Ohio Divsion Returns Homes

Grandson Writes a Book from His Grandfather's WWI Diaries

Those Adorable Dogs of War



Thanks to each and every one of you who has contributed material for this issue. Until our next issue, your editor, Mike Hanlon.
(Or send it to a friend)


Design by Shannon Niel
Content © Michael E. Hanlon